Rusk County Community Library is a part of the MORE system (My Online REsource) which allows patrons to check out materials from all member libraries. Holds can be placed online at any of the almost 50 MORE libraries.
General Loan Limits--100 items per person; 50 holds per person
Renewals are for the same length of time as the original circulation period; and items can be renewed twice if no holds exist for that item. We allow only 10 of the following items per person at one time: videos (VHS), DVDs, magazines, and music CDs. Other libraries may allow more of these items to be checked out by an individual at one time.
Most books circulate for 3 weeks, and can be renewed. This includes all fiction and non-fiction books for adults, young adults, and children, as well as audio fiction. Boxed TV series on DVD circulate for 2 weeks. Videos (VHS), DVDs, and magazines circulate for 1 week. There are some reference works which circulate, and these also can be checked out for 1 week.
Rusk County Community Library may restrict access to downloadable internet services, such as Freegal, on an individual basis, if requested by a patron.
When libraries purchase a videocassette or a DVD, or make a video file accessible to patrons for a specific loan period, they own the physical object but not the copyright. Copyright law, therefore, determines what libraries can and cannot do with the videotapes/DVDs/video files they own without infringing upon the copyright they do not own. Therefore, Rusk County Community Library will not knowingly loan a video to groups for use in (non-educational) public performances. If a patron inquires about a planned performance of a video, he or she should be informed that only private uses of it are lawful. Also, if the library is aware that patrons are checking out videos or DVDs in order to copy them, the patron should be advised that the use is not lawful. The library may suspend lending privileges.
Rusk County Community Library is willing to place requests for interlibrary loans for any patron in good standing. The library will not make ILL requests for materials owned in their library/consortium. The only exceptions are for book clubs which require more copies than are available within the system, and or unique deadline date issues (such as for educational purposes). 9-13-2016
RECOVERY OF MONEY DUE
RCCL will use a collection agency, in compliance with Wisconsin’s Act 169, to ensure the return of materials checked out by patrons, or to receive payment for materials not returned. RCCL will charge patrons the recovery fee(s) paid for this process. We will charge all patrons who check out materials owned by RCCL, regardless of the patron’s home library, and regardless of other libraries using a collection agency to charge for unreturned materials. The collection agency engaged in this task will be deemed an agent of the library and will be required to maintain confidentiality regarding the identity of any individual who borrows or uses the library's documents or other materials, resources or services. Any minor whose information is released to the collection agency will have the parent’s/legal guardian’s name included for the collection of monies due. There will be recovery fee added to the account when the agency is engaged so as to recover the cost of this process. The patron is responsible for paying this fee, as well as any monies owed to the library for materials/fines. Updated 6-15-2016
USE OF LIBRARY CARDS
Patrons must use their own library card to check out materials.
Parents/Legal Guardians: Parents/legal guardians may check out items on their children's cards without the children being present only if they are checking out materials for the child. If the parent has a card with fines/fees in excess of the accepted limit, they can only check out juvenile (J, BB, ER, etc.) or young adult (YA) materials on the child’s card.
Cardholders who have forgotten their cards: A patron who has a current library card but forgets to bring it may check out items once at a MORE library if he/she verifies his/her identity. Rusk County Community Library patrons may check out once every year without their card. This status will be re-set at the end of the calendar year. Patrons have the option of declaring their card lost and paying for a replacement card.
Cardholders who send someone else to pick up items on hold: Cardholders may send their library card with someone else for the purpose of checking out library materials that are on hold for that cardholder only. If the absent cardholder has fines or overdue items in excess of the accepted limit materials may not be checked out on that account.
MAY I CHECK OUT MATERIALS WITHOUT MY CARD?
Once every calendar year. For accuracy, your library card must be presented to check out materials. Library staff at the Circulation Desk may look up your patron record so long as there are no computer issues and identification or identifying questions will be requested. Your library card must be presented to check out materials if the computer system is not working for any reason. If you cannot find your card, you may need to get a new one.
- Fill out an application at the Circulation Desk
- Present proof of address—either the permanent address (if visiting) or the temporary address (if moving). Use one of the following:
- valid driver's license or photo identification
- utility bill
- check book with name & address imprint
- envelope addressed to you with cancelled postage
- Pay a $10.00 non-refundable fee
Approved by the Library Board September 2011; updated January 2014; July 2015;September 2106; September 2017
STATEMENT OF CONCERN ABOUT LIBRARY RESOURCES FOR RUSK COUNTY COMMUNITY LIBRARY
(SAMPLE. Please click here--> for printable version of form)
Street Address________________________________ City___________________________
State_________________________ ZIP____________ Phone___________________
Resource on which you are commenting:
_____Book _____Audio-visual Resource _____Magazine _____Content of Library Program _____Newspaper _____Other
Author/Publisher or Producer/
1. What brought this resource to your attention?
2. To what do you object? Please be specific.
3. Have you read or listened or viewed the entire content? If not, what parts?
4. What do you feel the effect of the material might be?
5. For what age group would you recommend this material?
6. In its place, what material of equal or better quality would you recommend?
7. What do you want the library to do with this material?
8. Additional comments
LIBRARY BILL OF RIGHTS
The Council of the American Library Association reaffirms its belief in the following basic policies that should govern the services of all libraries: As a responsibility of library service, books and other library materials should be chosen for values of interest, information, and enlightenment of all people of the community. In no case should library materials be excluded because of the race or nationality or the social, political, or religious views of the authors. Libraries should provide books and other materials presenting all points of view concerning the problems and issues of our times; no library materials should be proscribed or removed from libraries because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval. Censorship should be challenged by libraries in the maintenance of their responsibility to provide public information and enlightenment. Libraries should cooperate with all persons and groups concerned with resisting abridgement of free expression and free access to ideas. The rights of an individual to the use of the library should not be denied or abridged because of his age, race, religion, national origins, or social or political views. As an institution of education for democratic living, the library should welcome the use of its meeting rooms for socially useful and cultural activities and discussion of current public questions. Such meeting places should be available on equal terms to all groups in the community regardless of the beliefs and affiliations of their members, provided that the meeting be open to the public.
THE FREEDOM TO READ The freedom to read is essential to our democracy. It is continually under attack. Private groups and public authorities in various parts of the country are working to remove books from sale, to censor textbooks, to label "controversial" books, to distribute lists of "objectionable" books or authors, and to purge libraries. These actions apparently rise from a view that our national tradition of free expression is no longer valid; that censorship and suppression are needed to avoid the subversion of politics and the corruption of morals. We, as citizens devoted to the use of books and as librarians and publishers responsible for disseminating them, wish to assert the public interest in the preservation of the freedom to read. We are deeply concerned about these attempts at suppression. Most such attempts rest on a denial of the fundamental premise of democracy: that the ordinary citizen, by exercising critical judgment, will accept the good and reject the bad. The censors, public and private, assume that they should determine what is good and what is bad for their fellow citizens. We trust Americans to recognize propaganda, and to reject it. We do not believe they need to help of censors to assist them in this task. We do not believe they are prepared to sacrifice their heritage of a free press in order to be "protected" against what others think may be bad for them. We believe they still favor free enterprise in ideas and expression. We are aware, of course, that books are not alone in being subjected to efforts at suppression. We are aware that these efforts are related to a larger pattern of pressures being brought against education, the press, films, radio and television. The problem is not only one of actual censorship. The shadow of fear cast by these pressures lead, we suspect, to an even larger voluntary curtailment of expression by those who seek to avoid controversy. Such pressure toward conformity is perhaps natural to a time of uneasy change and pervading fear. Especially when so many of our apprehensions are directed against an ideology, the expression of a dissident idea becomes a thing feared in itself, and we tend to move against it as against a hostile deed, with suppression. And yet suppression is never more dangerous than in such a time of social tension. Freedom has given the United States the elasticity to endure strain. Freedom keeps open the path of novel and creative solutions, and enables change to come by choice. Every silencing of a heresy, every enforcement of an orthodoxy, diminishes the toughness and resilience of our society and leaves it the less able to deal with stress. Now as always in our history, books are among our greatest instruments of freedom. They are almost the only means for making generally available ideas or manners of expression that can initially command only a small audience. They are the natural medium for the new idea and the untried voice from which come the original contributions to social growth. They are essential to the extended discussion which serious thought requires, and to the accumulation of knowledge and ideas into organized collections. We believe that free communication is essential to the preservation of a free society and a creative culture. We believe that these pressures towards conformity present the danger of limiting the range and variety of inquiry and expression on which our democracy and our culture depend. We believe that every American community must jealously guard the freedom to publish and to circulate, in order to preserve its own freedom to read. We believe that publishers and librarians have a profound responsibility to give validity to that freedom to read by making it possible for the readers to choose freely from a variety of offerings. The freedom to read is guaranteed by the Constitution. Those with faith in free people will stand firm on these constitutional guarantees of essential rights and will exercise the responsibilities that accompany these rights. We therefore affirm these propositions:
1. It is in the public interest for publishers and librarians to make available the widest diversity of views and expressions, including those that are unorthodox or unpopular with the majority. Creative thought is by definition new, and what is new is different. The bearer of every new thought is a rebel until that idea is refined and tested. Totalitarian systems attempt to maintain themselves in power by the ruthless suppression of any concept that challenges the established orthodoxy. The power of a democratic system to adapt to change is vastly strengthened by the freedom of its citizens to choose widely from among conflicting opinions offered freely to them. To stifle every nonconformist idea at birth would mark the end of the democratic process. Furthermore, only through the constant activity of weighing and selecting can the democratic mind attain the strength demanded by times like these. We need to know not only what we believe but why we believe it.
2. Publishers, librarians, and booksellers do not need to endorse every idea or presentation contained in the books they make available. It would conflict with the public interest for them to establish their own political, moral or aesthetic views as a standard for determining what books should be published or circulated. Publishers and librarians serve the educational process by helping to make available knowledge and ideas required for the growth of the mind and the increase of learning. They do not foster education by imposing as mentors the patterns of their own thought. The people should have the freedom to read and consider a broader range of ideas that those that may be held by any single librarian or publisher or government or church. It is wrong that what one can read should be confined to what another thinks proper.
3. It is contrary to the public interest for publishers or librarians to determine the acceptability of a book on the basis of the personal history or political affiliations of the author. A book should be judged as a book. No art or literature can flourish if it is to be measured by the political views or private lives of its creators. No society of free people can flourish which draws up lists of writers to whom it will not listen, whatever they may have to say.
4. There is no place in our society for efforts to coerce the taste of others, to confine adults to the reading matter deemed suitable for adolescents, or to inhibit the efforts of writers to achieve artistic expression. To some, much of modern literature is shocking. But is not much of life itself shocking? We cut off literature at the source if we prevent writers from dealing with the stuff of life. Parents and teachers have a responsibility to prepare the young to meet the diversity of experiences in life to which they will be exposed, as they have a responsibility to help them learn to think critically for themselves. These are affirmative responsibilities, not to be discharged simply by preventing them from reading works for which they are not yet prepared. In these matters taste differs, and taste cannot be legislated; not can machinery be devised which will suit the demand of one group without limiting the freedom of others.
5. It is not in the public interest to force a reader to accept with any book the prejudgment of a label characterizing the book or author as subversive or dangerous. The ideal of labeling presupposes the existence of individuals or groups with wisdom to determine by authority what is good or bad for the citizen. It presupposes that individuals must be directed in making up their minds about the ideas they examine. But Americans do not need others to do their thinking for them.
6. It is the responsibility of publishers and librarians, as guardians of the people’s freedom to read, to contest encroachments upon that freedom by individuals or groups seeking to impose their own standards or tastes upon the community at large. It is inevitable in the give and take of the democratic process that the political, the moral, or the aesthetic concepts of an individual or group will occasionally collide with those of another individual or group. In a free society individuals are free to determine for themselves what they wish to read, and each group is free to determine what it will recommend to its freely associated members. But no group is free to determine what it will recommend to its freely associated members. But no group has the right to take the law into its own hands, and to impose its own concept of politics or morality upon other members of a democratic society. Freedom is no freedom if it is accorded only to the accepted and the inoffensive.
7. It is the responsibility of publishers and librarians to give full meaning to the freedom to read by providing books that enrich the quality and diversity of thought and expression. By the exercise of this affirmative responsibility, they can demonstrate that the answer to a bad book is a good one, the answer to a bad idea is a good one. The freedom to read is of little consequence when expended on the trivial; it is frustrated when the reader cannot obtain matter fit for the reader’s purpose. What is needed is not only the absence of restraint, but the positive provision of opportunity for the people to read the best that has been thought and said. Books are the major channel by which the intellectual inheritance is handed down, and the principal means of its testing and growth. The defense of their freedom and integrity, and the enlargement of their service to society, requires of all publishers and librarians the utmost of their faculties, and deserves of all citizens the fullest of their support.
We state these propositions neither lightly nor as easy generalizations. We here stake out a lofty claim for the value of books. We do so because we believe that they are good, possessed of enormous variety and usefulness, worthy of cherishing and keeping free. We realize that the application of these propositions may mean the dissemination of ideas and manners of expression that are repugnant to many persons. We do not state these propositions in the comfortable belief that what people read is unimportant. We believe rather that what people read is deeply important; that ideas can be dangerous; but that the suppression of ideas is fatal to a democratic society. Freedom itself is a dangerous way of life, but it is ours.
This statement was originally issued in May of 1953 by the Westchester Conference of the American Library Association and the American Book Publishers Council, which in 1970 consolidated with the American Educational Publishers Institute to become the Association of American Publishers. Adopted June 25, 1953; revised January 28, 1972, January 16, 1991, by the ALA Council and the AAP Freedom to Read Committee. A Joint Statement by: American Library Association & Association of American Publishers Subsequently Endorsed by: American Booksellers Association, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, American Civil Liberties Union, American Federation of Teachers AFL-CIO, Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, Association of American University Presses, Children’s Book Council, Freedom to Read Foundation, International Reading Association, Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, National Association of College Stores, National Council of Teachers of English, P.E.N. — American Center, People for the American Way, Periodical and Book Association of America, Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S. Society of Professional Journalists, Women’s National Book Association, YMCA of the U.S.A.